Historian Michael Jones's chapters were much more enlightening and enjoyable. His straightforward exploration of Richard's actions and motivations segued neatly into how Tudor libel turned Richard III into a historical monster. His style is a bit dry, though. I wanted to enjoy Richard III: The Search for the King's Grave but unfortunately the authors made it difficult to do so.
Sunday, March 13, 2016
Richard III: The Search for the King's Grave
"Oh, enough about Richard - let's talk about me!" That's how Philippa Langley's chapters came across. A writer who organized the search for Richard III's remains (found under a Leicester car park in 2012 and confirmed as Richard's in 2013), she makes Richard almost an afterthought to her search, and her navel-gazing. I am interested in the archaeology involved in finding the grave, but Langley glosses over that and keeps coming back to the "feeling" she had when she stood over the R painted on the tarmac and under which Richard was eventually found. (My cynical side kept thinking about how plastic memory is and how easily one can implant false memories in one's own mind.) Langley's writing style didn't help; I can't remember the last time an author irritated me so much.
Labels:
England,
history,
Michael Jones,
Philippa Langley,
Plantagenet
Saturday, March 12, 2016
The Man Who Loved China
I should have enjoyed The Man Who Loved China more than I did. I've read a few books by Simon Winchester and found them engrossing, and Joseph Needham is a fascinating character. A true polymath, he read biochemistry at Cambridge, became a fellow of the college, and married a fellow scientist. (Joseph and Dorothy Needham - also a biochemist who studied the chemical composition of muscles - are the only married couple to both be named fellows of the Royal Academy.)
Then Needham met a young Chinese scientist named Lu Gwei-djen. They started a life-long affair (with the knowledge and consent of Dorothy Needham - they had the sort of bohemian post-Edwardian arrangement that makes me think of the Bloomsbury Set), and Needham's love for Gwei-djen led to a love of China. Initially attached to a diplomatic mission, he set out to confirm his theory that China and the West had parallel tracks, both inventing technologies that at the time were considered purely Western. He was right, and his discoveries changed the world's view of China.
I should have been fascinated by Winchester's narrative, but for some reason it didn't make much of an impression on me. Perhaps it was how and when I read it, a few pages at a time before bed during the dreariest part of the winter. It may be a book that requires more concentrated attention.
Then Needham met a young Chinese scientist named Lu Gwei-djen. They started a life-long affair (with the knowledge and consent of Dorothy Needham - they had the sort of bohemian post-Edwardian arrangement that makes me think of the Bloomsbury Set), and Needham's love for Gwei-djen led to a love of China. Initially attached to a diplomatic mission, he set out to confirm his theory that China and the West had parallel tracks, both inventing technologies that at the time were considered purely Western. He was right, and his discoveries changed the world's view of China.
I should have been fascinated by Winchester's narrative, but for some reason it didn't make much of an impression on me. Perhaps it was how and when I read it, a few pages at a time before bed during the dreariest part of the winter. It may be a book that requires more concentrated attention.
Saturday, March 5, 2016
Sun in a Bottle
Imagine, unlimited power where the only by-product is helium, a non-toxic gas used both industrially and to blow up party balloons. Sun in a Bottle traces the 20th Century quest for viable, and then commercially viable fusion power. Building on the (ultimately wrong) Too Cheap to Meter dreams of early fission power and the sensible desire not to create waste products that could bring about the end of the world, scientists on both sides of the Cold War raced to create fusion reactors which produced more energy than they used. Charles Seife has written a fascinating, if somewhat dry, narrative of what is still an unsuccessful enterprise.
Jane and the Twelve Days of Christmas
1814 is drawing to a close and Jane, Cassandra, and their mother travel to their former home to spend the holidays with the Mr. Collins-like James Austen and his Mary Musgrove-like second wife, Mary. They're in for a drearily holiday until a neighbor invites the family for a series of parties and balls to celebrate the full Christmas season (the holiday not being confined to a mere day until the rather dreary Prince Albert imported that tradition). Jane, as usual, stumbles upon a murder and with the help of Benjamin West's son Raphael (an artist in his own right but here making sketches for a later work of his father's), untangles a web involving both clandestine love affairs and foreign affairs. As usual, the charm of the story lies in "meeting" the inspirations for Jane's characters and seeing her for the witty, rather sharp-tongued woman she must have been (rather than the prim spinster her nieces and nephews made her out to be after her death).
Saturday, February 20, 2016
The Night Searchers
Marcia Muller hasn't slumped in her nearly 40-year Sharon McCone series, but not all of her novels are quite up to the same level. I enjoyed The Night Searchers, but it doesn't quite live up to the most recent installments. Maybe that's because I've somehow missed its immediate predecessor, but it also covers a transition period for Sharon and that lurked in the background throughout the book.
Sharon's current clients are a young couple, Camilla and Jay Givens. He's a successful accountant; she's a vague woman who drifts through hobbies and jobs, and thinks that she saw a satanic ritual. Her husband thinks she's crazy, but it that to his advantage? Jay also belongs to a group called the Night Searchers who go on late-night treasure hunts. Sharon and her nephew/employe Mick join them, stumble on a second death, and this case eventually ties in with Sharon husband Hy's current case. Overall, I found it entertaining but not particularly satisfying. The mystery was decent (if tied up a bit too abruptly), and I always enjoy spending time with Sharon and her friends. Worth reading, but mainly as part of the series.
Sharon's current clients are a young couple, Camilla and Jay Givens. He's a successful accountant; she's a vague woman who drifts through hobbies and jobs, and thinks that she saw a satanic ritual. Her husband thinks she's crazy, but it that to his advantage? Jay also belongs to a group called the Night Searchers who go on late-night treasure hunts. Sharon and her nephew/employe Mick join them, stumble on a second death, and this case eventually ties in with Sharon husband Hy's current case. Overall, I found it entertaining but not particularly satisfying. The mystery was decent (if tied up a bit too abruptly), and I always enjoy spending time with Sharon and her friends. Worth reading, but mainly as part of the series.
Behind the Shattered Glass
The rich are eccentric where everyone else is merely strange. Lady Emily's mother, however, has no tolerance for either. This fact sets up some of the most entertaining scenes in Behind the Shattered Glass, Tasha Alexander's eighth mystery. Lady Catherine Bromley, wife of an Earl and confidant of Queen Victoria, is *not* amused when her daughter's neighbor staggers across the threshold and dies. It's just not what one expects when visiting your daughter, her husband Colin, and their infant twins at his family's country seat. Colin has no choice but to investigate, and (to her mother's chagrin) enlist's Emily's help.
The Hargraveses barely knew the newly elevated Marquess of Montague when he had the gall to die upon their doorstep, but they were mildly acquainted with his cousin Matilda, heir to the title - or so she thinks. It turns out that there's a missing heir, a young man who's the product of a shunned family line and who has spent his adult life as an explorer and adventurer. Matilda asks Emily to prove that this *Rodney* person is not the product of a legitimate line, and anyone familiar with the screwball comedies of the 1930s should know that by the end of the book, it won't matter. More seriously, Emily and Colin also investigate the late Marquess's background, finding him more and more unsavory with every discovery. Technically a gentleman but no gentleman, he'd misused an Oxford friend and dallied with the vicar's daughter while forming an engagement to an American millionaire's daughter - and that's just what Colin and Emily discover in the first day or so of their investigation.
As she's done with most of her mysteries, Alexander includes a parallel narrative which eventually ties into the main plot. Lily, an artistically and musically inclined housemaid, tells this part of the story, including backstairs squabbles and potentially important information about the night of the murder. Lily also catches the attention of Colin's friend Simon, a Duke whose eccentricity includes treating servants like people.
Simon isn't the only person who's chafing at the restrictions of Victorian society. Emily, as mentioned in A Crimson Warning has joined her mother-in-law in the suffrage movement. It's a cause Colin can't bring himself to support but he, unlike his wife the Earl's daughter, believes that class distinctions should start falling. 120 years later, they both seem to have giant blind spots but for the time, they're quite progressive. I liked how Alexander showed that the two can disagree while still gently pushing each other towards their own causes. I wonder if she's going to take a more political turn in later episodes. That could be very interesting.
The Hargraveses barely knew the newly elevated Marquess of Montague when he had the gall to die upon their doorstep, but they were mildly acquainted with his cousin Matilda, heir to the title - or so she thinks. It turns out that there's a missing heir, a young man who's the product of a shunned family line and who has spent his adult life as an explorer and adventurer. Matilda asks Emily to prove that this *Rodney* person is not the product of a legitimate line, and anyone familiar with the screwball comedies of the 1930s should know that by the end of the book, it won't matter. More seriously, Emily and Colin also investigate the late Marquess's background, finding him more and more unsavory with every discovery. Technically a gentleman but no gentleman, he'd misused an Oxford friend and dallied with the vicar's daughter while forming an engagement to an American millionaire's daughter - and that's just what Colin and Emily discover in the first day or so of their investigation.
As she's done with most of her mysteries, Alexander includes a parallel narrative which eventually ties into the main plot. Lily, an artistically and musically inclined housemaid, tells this part of the story, including backstairs squabbles and potentially important information about the night of the murder. Lily also catches the attention of Colin's friend Simon, a Duke whose eccentricity includes treating servants like people.
Simon isn't the only person who's chafing at the restrictions of Victorian society. Emily, as mentioned in A Crimson Warning has joined her mother-in-law in the suffrage movement. It's a cause Colin can't bring himself to support but he, unlike his wife the Earl's daughter, believes that class distinctions should start falling. 120 years later, they both seem to have giant blind spots but for the time, they're quite progressive. I liked how Alexander showed that the two can disagree while still gently pushing each other towards their own causes. I wonder if she's going to take a more political turn in later episodes. That could be very interesting.
Sunday, February 14, 2016
This Is Improbable Too!
Science can look silly - or even be silly. Politicians love highlighting shrimp on treadmills and other apparently pointless scientific studies. What they don't realize is that experiments that appear pointless on their face can be (and often are) applied to wider, more practical problems. Marc Abrahams, editor of The Annals of Improbable Research and the creator of the IgNobel prizes looks at the issue from the other angle. He looks for the odd or humorous side of legitimate scientific research (and he appreciates those who investigate questions no one asked). Like its predecessor, This Is Improbable Too! makes a wonderful commute book. Entertaining enough to grab your attention but structured so that it can easily be read in short blocks, it's like the IgNobel prizes. It makes you laugh, then makes you think.
X
Even detectives can get conned. Teddy Xanakis pulls a pretty good one on Kinsey Millhone early in X, and on top of it Teddy paid her with counterfeit $100 bills. Following the events of W Is for Wasted, Kinsey is in a position to investigate a personal case without much hope of being paid, so she works the case to a generally satisfying end.
Teddy's con isn't the main plot, though. X is mostly a direct sequel to W Is for Wasted, with Kinsey diving into a cold case left behind by Pete Wolinsky. Pete's ethics were questionable at best, but Kinsey became friendly with his widow Ruth while solving Pete's last case (a case in which he claimed to be working with Kinsey), and ultimately his murder. The IRS (or someone claiming to be from the IRS) claims that there's a problem with Pete's estate, so Ruth asks Kinsey to search the box of Pete's documents (marked with a large X) which Kinsey has under her desk.
Pete's files turn out to be from the case that ended the partnership between Benjamin Byrd and Morley Shine, the investigators under whom Kinsey apprenticed and with whom Pete occasionally worked. Ned Lowe's wife apparently committed suicide and Pete's investigation cast doubt on the verdict. Since she has no other active cases (and a financial cushion thanks to her inheritance), Kinsey picks up the cold case, solves it, and partially rehabilitates her colleague's reputation.
There are only two more books to come in the Kinsey Millhone series, and I'm going to miss them. The last few have been among the best, and X didn't disappoint me. Beside two strong mysteries, Grafton included a comic subplot involving Henry Pitts's interest in water-saving technology and his and Kinsey's strange new neighbors. She's also bringing back characters from Kinsey's past. Two of Kinsey's ex-lovers, Cheney Phillips and Robert Deitz, appeared in W is for Wasted, and Phillips plays a major part in X as well. There's also a cameo by Kinsey's other ex, Jonah Robb, and a visit to her old friend Vera (now the mother of three kids under five and 8 months pregnant with twins). With Kinsey's recent discovery of Millhone relatives and trust with her maternal-side family, it looks like Grafton is setting up a happy ending for her heroine. I just hope it includes Henry Pitts.
Teddy's con isn't the main plot, though. X is mostly a direct sequel to W Is for Wasted, with Kinsey diving into a cold case left behind by Pete Wolinsky. Pete's ethics were questionable at best, but Kinsey became friendly with his widow Ruth while solving Pete's last case (a case in which he claimed to be working with Kinsey), and ultimately his murder. The IRS (or someone claiming to be from the IRS) claims that there's a problem with Pete's estate, so Ruth asks Kinsey to search the box of Pete's documents (marked with a large X) which Kinsey has under her desk.
Pete's files turn out to be from the case that ended the partnership between Benjamin Byrd and Morley Shine, the investigators under whom Kinsey apprenticed and with whom Pete occasionally worked. Ned Lowe's wife apparently committed suicide and Pete's investigation cast doubt on the verdict. Since she has no other active cases (and a financial cushion thanks to her inheritance), Kinsey picks up the cold case, solves it, and partially rehabilitates her colleague's reputation.
There are only two more books to come in the Kinsey Millhone series, and I'm going to miss them. The last few have been among the best, and X didn't disappoint me. Beside two strong mysteries, Grafton included a comic subplot involving Henry Pitts's interest in water-saving technology and his and Kinsey's strange new neighbors. She's also bringing back characters from Kinsey's past. Two of Kinsey's ex-lovers, Cheney Phillips and Robert Deitz, appeared in W is for Wasted, and Phillips plays a major part in X as well. There's also a cameo by Kinsey's other ex, Jonah Robb, and a visit to her old friend Vera (now the mother of three kids under five and 8 months pregnant with twins). With Kinsey's recent discovery of Millhone relatives and trust with her maternal-side family, it looks like Grafton is setting up a happy ending for her heroine. I just hope it includes Henry Pitts.
The Black Book
The Black Book succeeds as a novel but fails as a mystery. I didn't find any of the interlocking mysteries (the attack on his DS Brian Holmes, the murder of the chef at Holmes's favorite Elvis-themed restaurant, and the cold case surrounding a hotel fire) Rebus solved particularly satisfactory. I found Rebus's personal life (he's crashing on the sofa of his own apartment because his girlfriend has kicked him out and he's sublet the apartment to students; then his estranged brother appears looking for a place to stay) to be more coherently plotted. Despite its weaknesses, I enjoyed The Black Book, but I recommend it more as an installment in a series. If you're reading books individually, you can probably skip this one.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)